The Gallifreyan Embassy
Home of the Doctor Who podcast DOCTOR WHO: PODSHOCK
Advertising | Donate | Feedback | New Website | Podshock | Shop | Forum | Media Gallery | Web Resources | Polls
 Gallifreyan Embassy 3.0  
  • How do you rate Doctor Who: Deep Breath? (5=Fantastic)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Live Show Reviewing 'Into the Dalek' Scheduled for Sunday, Aug 31st
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Live Show Reviewing 'Deep Breath' Scheduled for Sunday, Aug 24th
  • BBC One 'Deep Breath' Promotional Advertisement Video [VIDEO]
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 306 - Interviews with Ian Marter and Sarah Sutton
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 305 - Interviews with Peter Howell and Ron Katz
  • Five Years of The Cultdom Collective Podcast!
  • The Official BBC Teaser Promo Video for the New 2014 Series [VIDEO]
  • How do you rate Doctor Who: The Claws of Axos? (5=Fantastic)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 304 - 'The Claws of Axos' is Reviewed

  •  Topics  
    Home
    Doctor Who News (188/0)
    DW: Podshock (201/0)
    DW Reviews (33/0)
    Torchwood (15/0)
    Sarah Jane Adven... (13/0)
    General News (29/0)
    Embassy News (19/0)
    Editorials (5/0)
    Alien Tech (2/0)

     Extra! Extra!  

    Become a Podshock Supporting Subscriber


     Randomizer  
    Breaking News of 1986...
    Breaking News of 1986...
    Browse Album

     User Functions  
    :

    :


    Lost your password?

     Support Podshock  

    This site and our podcast are free to use and listen to respectively. Though there are costs involved in maintaining and producing both. If you like, please make a donation to help offset these costs and to help ensure that we can continue to bring you both. Thank you so much.

    You can make a one time donation of any amount you like using the above "Donate" button. If you rather make an annual recurring donation of $25 (that is less than 50 cents a week), use the "Subscribe" button below.

    Save big on toys & collectibles at Entertainment Earth! CLICK HERE for Doctor Who, Star Wars, Buffy, Ozzy, Spider-Man, & more!


     Events  
    There are no upcoming events

     Audible UK  

    Dr Who Audio Downloads from audible.co.uk


     DWNY  
    DWNY

     Ads by Google  

     Older Stories  
    Wednesday 06-May
  • In Russell/Moffat We Trust Shirts and More (1)

  • Tuesday 05-May
  • Join Us for Our Second Second Life Meet Up (3)

  • Friday 01-May
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 147 (0)

  • Wednesday 29-Apr
  • Sonic Newsdriver for the Week of the 27th of April 2009 (0)

  • Saturday 25-Apr
  • Who Party 14 Toronto Doctor Who Convention (0)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 146 (1)

  • Thursday 23-Apr
  • Sonic Newsdriver and Hoo on Who for the Week of the 20 April 2009 (0)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 145 (4)

  • Wednesday 15-Apr
  • Three New Producers Announced (0)

  • Saturday 11-Apr
  • Planet Of The Dead Canadian air date confirmed (0)

  • Tuesday 07-Apr
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Recognized as Best Podcast (1)
  • Sonic Newsdriver for the Week of the 5th of April 2009 (0)

  • Wednesday 01-Apr
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 144 (5)

  • Friday 20-Mar
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 143 (3)
  • Hitchhiker's Guide to British Sci-Fi - Episode 3 (1)

  •  Notice  

    Doctor Who and the TARDIS are owned and trademarked by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). The Gallifreyan Embassy and the Doctor Who: Podshock podcast are not connected to the BBC in any way. No infringement is intended.



     

     
     Home »  Web Site Feedback »  Forum Structure
    Prev Topic Next Next Topic Printable Version
    Forum Structure Views: 1159
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 12:23 AM EDT



    What are everyone's feelings about having the forums arranged by each Doctor's era as they currently are right now? Is it too much?

    Would decades work better (i.e. 1960's, 1970's, etc.)? By using decades, it will bring the 11 forums for each Doctor into just 5 (well, soon to be 6, come next year).

    I am trying to resist going the segregation way of using "1963-1989 (or 1996) and 2005-current," but perhaps it should be an option to consider as well.

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Louis

    ☛ Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LouisTrapani ♥ ♥
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 06:08 AM EDT
    [Quote  by:  Louis]

    What are everyone's feelings about having the forums arranged by each Doctor's era as they currently are right now? Is it too much?

    Would decades work better (i.e. 1960's, 1970's, etc.)? By using decades, it will bring the 11 forums for each Doctor into just 5 (well, soon to be 6, come next year).

    I am trying to resist going the segregation way of using "1963-1989 (or 1996) and 2005-current," but perhaps it should be an option to consider as well.

    Thanks.

    Cheers,
    Louis


    Well Louis, personally - I like the individual Doctor sections.

    Cheers, daveac

    daveac on blip.tv, TalkShoe, iTunes, LiveVideo, uStream, GE, Sci-Fi, DWO, DS & WTA, Dave C on WLP, cooperda on AVF, dac100 on YouTube & PB, dac on Tiscali
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 07:12 AM EDT
    Personally I agree with Dave. The individual Doctor sections work for me.

    [Quote  by:  Louis] Is it too much?

    Would decades work better (i.e. 1960's, 1970's, etc.)? By using decades, it will bring the 11 forums for each Doctor into just 5 (well, soon to be 6, come next year).


    All the forums I use (which admittedly is only about 5 or 6, and this is the only Doctor Who board I use) have more sections than here.

    I really don't think we're overloaded with categories. It was the simple fact that on places like Outpost Gallifrey's boards, you seemingly couldnt get a word in edgeways that brought me here in the first place. There are 100s of sections, and you've got people on there with 20,000 posts (how the hell anyone reaches that number is beyond me).

    I greatly prefer our smaller community and it's very neat, simple structure.

    Nothing dies of old age on Skaro!
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 07:39 AM EDT
    If you think this forum's overloaded Louis, you should check out DWO's. They've got a forum for everything and I mean everything!

    I like this forum as it is! Big Grin

    Please check out my blog, as I attempt to watch and review EVERY Doctor Who episode! http://journeythroughtimeandspace.blogspot.com/
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 08:30 AM EDT
    I agree with the consensus so far. Individual Doctor forums seem to work well and are very intuitive as to where to post or look for certain topics. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 09:16 AM EDT
    I think it would be best to consolidate the forums slightly, less is more.

    I would suggest you have a Forum for the classic era, as you suggested and then one for the new series. Perhaps a separate forum for "the Matt Smith" era when it starts as well as I suspect the current doctor always generates most traffic, especially when it's on air.

      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 12:12 PM EDT
    I like the current structure, one forum per Doctor and separate forums for Torchwood and SJA, the GA etc.

    This works well, since this give a clean definition on where to post items.

    e.g. I want to post something on 'The key 2 time: The chaos pool', okay it goes in the Peter Davison section, likewise an item on the 8th Doctor Big finish Shada story, it goes under Paul McGann.

    If we change to a decade based system do audio and book content belong with the time period they are released in, or the time period that the related Doctor was on the TV (TV in the UK to be more specific).

    There is a big Wibbly Wobbly Timey Wimey ... Stuff problem here.


    In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed are Kings
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 03:39 PM EDT
    Yes, I agree with the majority of posts above that the existing structure is very logical and user-friendly. I've enjoyed my first year on the forums, thanks to everyone here!

      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, May 12 2009 @ 11:31 PM EDT
    I'm with everyone, I like the forums separated by Doctor. It's a very clean and simple way of having things organized, never had a problem finding anything.

    As the old adage goes, if it ain't broke, don't fix it!

      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Wednesday, May 13 2009 @ 12:36 AM EDT


    Wow. Thanks everyone! I was worried that I may not get much of a response, at least not as quickly as this... Big Grin

    OK, they will stay in same structure as they are now, categorized in each Doctor's era.

    This makes things easier than trying to reinvent the wheel.

    I am working on a new version of our website behind the scenes. It's using a different CMS (content management system) than we are currently using, which means everything will be changing. But all the content here is not going away. Even after we migrate to the new system, this will be around as an archive of the last four years (when the site was upgraded with the current system) back in 2005.

    I am not sure the new CMS is the perfect solution, there seems to be pros and cons with any change. I will spell them out better when I have a better idea of the major differences. I am worried about the forums because I know how important it is for everyone (including myself).

    Thanks again for all the feedback.

    Cheers,
    Louis

    ☛ Follow me on Twitter at http://twitter.com/LouisTrapani ♥ ♥
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     

     
    Topic Legend:
    Normal Topic Normal Topic
    Locked Topic Locked Topic
    Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
    New Post New Post
    Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
    Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
    Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic
    You may not post messages
    Full HTML is allowed
    Words are censored