The Gallifreyan Embassy
Home of the Doctor Who podcast DOCTOR WHO: PODSHOCK
Advertising | Donate | Feedback | New Website | Podshock | Shop | Forum | Media Gallery | Web Resources | Polls
 Gallifreyan Embassy 3.0  
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Live Show Reviewing 'Time Heist' Scheduled for Sunday, Sept 21st
  • How do you rate Doctor Who: Time Heist? (5=Fantastic)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 310 - 'Listen' Reviewed
  • How do you rate Doctor Who: Listen? (5=Fantastic)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Live Show Reviewing 'Listen' Scheduled for Sunday, Sept 14th
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 309 - 'Robot of Sherwood' Reviewed
  • Patrick Troughton as Robin Hood Seen in 'Robot of Sherwood'
  • How do you rate Doctor Who: Robot of Sherwood? (5=Fantastic)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Live Show Reviewing 'Robot of Sherwood' Scheduled for Sunday, Sept 7th
  • Doctor Who: Podshock 308 - 'Into The Dalek' Reviewed

  •  Topics  
    Home
    Doctor Who News (188/0)
    DW: Podshock (201/0)
    DW Reviews (33/0)
    Torchwood (15/0)
    Sarah Jane Adven... (13/0)
    General News (29/0)
    Embassy News (19/0)
    Editorials (5/0)
    Alien Tech (2/0)

     Extra! Extra!  

    Become a Podshock Supporting Subscriber


     Randomizer  
    Face of Boe
    Face of Boe
    Browse Album

     User Functions  
    :

    :


    Lost your password?

     Support Podshock  

    This site and our podcast are free to use and listen to respectively. Though there are costs involved in maintaining and producing both. If you like, please make a donation to help offset these costs and to help ensure that we can continue to bring you both. Thank you so much.

    You can make a one time donation of any amount you like using the above "Donate" button. If you rather make an annual recurring donation of $25 (that is less than 50 cents a week), use the "Subscribe" button below.

    Save big on toys & collectibles at Entertainment Earth! CLICK HERE for Doctor Who, Star Wars, Buffy, Ozzy, Spider-Man, & more!


     Events  
    There are no upcoming events

     Audible UK  

    Dr Who Audio Downloads from audible.co.uk


     DWNY  
    DWNY

     Ads by Google  

     Older Stories  
    Wednesday 06-May
  • In Russell/Moffat We Trust Shirts and More (1)

  • Tuesday 05-May
  • Join Us for Our Second Second Life Meet Up (3)

  • Friday 01-May
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 147 (0)

  • Wednesday 29-Apr
  • Sonic Newsdriver for the Week of the 27th of April 2009 (0)

  • Saturday 25-Apr
  • Who Party 14 Toronto Doctor Who Convention (0)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 146 (1)

  • Thursday 23-Apr
  • Sonic Newsdriver and Hoo on Who for the Week of the 20 April 2009 (0)
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 145 (4)

  • Wednesday 15-Apr
  • Three New Producers Announced (0)

  • Saturday 11-Apr
  • Planet Of The Dead Canadian air date confirmed (0)

  • Tuesday 07-Apr
  • Doctor Who: Podshock Recognized as Best Podcast (1)
  • Sonic Newsdriver for the Week of the 5th of April 2009 (0)

  • Wednesday 01-Apr
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 144 (5)

  • Friday 20-Mar
  • Doctor Who: Podshock - Episode 143 (3)
  • Hitchhiker's Guide to British Sci-Fi - Episode 3 (1)

  •  Notice  

    Doctor Who and the TARDIS are owned and trademarked by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). The Gallifreyan Embassy and the Doctor Who: Podshock podcast are not connected to the BBC in any way. No infringement is intended.



     

     
     Home »  General Discussions »  OT: Casino Royale
    Prev Topic Next Next Topic Printable Version
    OT: Casino Royale Views: 2063
     Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 11:44 AM EST
    [Quote  by:  DarthSkeptical] So I finally got around to seeing this damn thing, and I quite enjoyed it. But I don't get one aspect of it. It was hyped as a reboot. But where's the reboot?


    I didn't really see it so much as a "reboot", but as an examination of a Bond who still has some hard lessons to learn (don't trust the pretty ladies, don't eat or drink everything handed to you, etc.).

    I could see him in later films basically "switching off" the take-everything-seriously side of himself and transmorgifying into the more flamboyant, devil-may-care type of Bond we've known.

    I can suspend my disbelief enough to see Judi Dench as M, but I think you have a good point about the Cold War.

    [As an amusing aside, I recall a young boy sitting two seats away from me saying "What's the Cold War?" to the person sitting next to him. Man, makes me feel old.. ] Rolling Eyes

    Did you say "74,384,338 to 1 against"? That's my lucky number!
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 12:06 PM EST
    [Quote  by:  seanhuxter]

    I would have preferred a real retelling of the book and dated in the 1950s. Now THAT would have been worth seeing.

    (Not that this wasn't worth seeing, but it was a bit of a disappointment.)

    Sean.


    Agreed. I'd like to have seen a Bond film set back in the '50's, when the books were written. There's something about the whole cold war backdrop that adds a certain something. After the efforts of the previous few Brosnan Bond films, they needed to try something else anyway. Not that I had anything against Pierce, he was a great Bond, but the actual films were awful.

    Incidentally, I know the bloke who did the CGI sequence of Bond wind surfing on a car door away from the big laser during Die Another Day, and never cease to mention it when I see him. Much to his ever-lasting SHAME.

    Twisted Evil

    If half the art of survival is running away, the other half is knowing when to keep a straight face.
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Thursday, November 30 2006 @ 01:50 PM EST
    I saw this the other night, was a lot better than them previous few films, more down to earth with less gagets than before. The stunts were pretty over-the-top though, I'm sure the guy Bond chases at the start is related to Toad from X-Men... Bond often seems to choose very impractacle places to fight as well.

    At one point I had to explain to my dad, who saw it with me, that if you shoot any unmarked barrels in an action movie, or a video game, they will of course explode with spectacular results...

    I'm looking forward to the next one, especially finding out more about the mysterious organisation behind everything (SMERSH in the book). I really hope it turns out to SPECTRE! (Although COBRA would be good! Laughing Out Loud )

    I loved the first movie, it had a random, disorganized, surreal feel that really appeals to me. Also it boasts an AMAZING soundtrack by Burt Bacharach that beats the pants off anything David Arnold ever produced, including the Dusty Springfield classic 'The Look of Love', which is probably more fondly remembered than the movie itself.

    I also enjoyed the book, especially for its very clear description of how to play baccarat, I was only about 14 when I read it but I was soon nagging my friends to play it with me...

    Never accept an evil you can change. -Andre Gide
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Sunday, December 24 2006 @ 03:41 PM EST
    C.O.B.R.A I believe is actually a British Government disaster think take so they couldn't use that acronym.

    Forget the shooty dog thing!
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Sunday, December 24 2006 @ 03:46 PM EST
    Just did some checking and found this on wiki

    Cabinet Office Briefing Rooms (COBR) is a UK government coordination facility which is activated in cases of national or regional emergency or crisis, or during events abroad with major implications for the UK. It is often referred to as COBRA (or Cobra; see initialism), in apparent confusion with the relatively benign conference room A of the Cabinet Office, but this usage is established even within the government. The term COBR is used both for the actual facility, and for the committees which meet there.

    Forget the shooty dog thing!
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Monday, April 02 2007 @ 11:39 PM EDT
    Heh, it's a bit late to be posting on Casino Royale, but my weekly YouTube trolling had me randomly running across this rather well done piece of editing that I thought others might want to see:


    "I think of myself as ambitious in casting terms, and I know that Bonnie [Langford] has the potential to make the part totally unirritating . . ." JNT, 1986
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, April 03 2007 @ 02:09 AM EDT
    and the torture scene explains why bond never got any women pregnant!

    "Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth."
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, April 03 2007 @ 07:57 AM EDT
    It's funny this thread should be posted to and bumped up on the radar screen now, since I finally got to see the movie a week or two back. I really enjoyed it, too. I particularly liked the free-running/parkour chase near the beginning. I even liked the new opening credit sequence that didn't feature any naked women. Big Grin

    The reboot didn't bother me at all. I just think the ending dragged on a bit. They needed to shorten that stretch between the final two action sequences. But Daniel Craig kicked butt. He jumps up in my listing, as such...

    Connery
    Brosnon
    Dalton
    Craig
    Lazenbee (sp?)
    Moore

    I always really liked Dalton and wished he had been given a few more movies. His first (Living Daylights) wasn't great because it was written to be a Moore movie, but his second (License to Kill)* was great.

    -L

    *It always cracks me up to recall that the original title was to be License Revoked but they changed it when they figured not enough Americans would know what revoked meant. *shakes head in shame*

    I'm going "Full Circle" and putting my avatar back to what it was when I first joined. :)
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Tuesday, April 03 2007 @ 10:31 AM EDT
    [Quote  by:  Linquel]

    *It always cracks me up to recall that the original title was to be License Revoked but they changed it when they figured not enough Americans would know what revoked meant. *shakes head in shame*


    But they all know what Kill means Big Grin

    In the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed are Kings
      Profile    PM    Email   
     Quote 
     
     Thursday, August 09 2007 @ 07:34 AM EDT
    Just to bump this thread one more time for a bit of fun, here's how Casino Royale might've looked with Tom Hanks in the lead . . .


    "I think of myself as ambitious in casting terms, and I know that Bonnie [Langford] has the potential to make the part totally unirritating . . ." JNT, 1986
      Profile    PM    Email    Website 
     Quote 
     

     
    Topic Legend:
    Normal Topic Normal Topic
    Locked Topic Locked Topic
    Sticky Topic Sticky Topic
    New Post New Post
    Sticky Topic W/ New Post Sticky Topic W/ New Post
    Locked Topic W/ New Post Locked Topic W/ New Post
    Subscribe to this topic Subscribe to this topic
    You may not post messages
    Full HTML is allowed
    Words are censored