
Now more than ever, we need your support! Become a Supporting Subscriber today.
How do you rate Doctor Who: Vampires of Venice? (5=Fantastic)
Home to the Doctor Who Podcast - Doctor Who: Podshock

Now more than ever, we need your support! Become a Supporting Subscriber today.
Administrator - Posted on 08 May 2010
Subscribe to
the Doctor Who podcast
Doctor Who: Podshock
Direct podcast feeds:
MP3 Format Podcast:
Doctor Who: Podshock MP3![]()

absolutely loved Matt Smith, wasn't too keen on the creature design [didn't even look like a fish
]
Story line was cool, with everything I would personally expect from an episode except what Intervain said, the design. Though I wouldn't have expected a fish-looking creature but I did expect something with a little more smooth texture and such... But than again that's baseing it on human/earth refrences... (My vote was slightly leaning more towards 4 1/2 TARDIS groans than 4...)
T. Blake
but to me it was the weakest episode so far this season. It did have a classic Who feel to it, which is good. Overall, it was my first 3 of the season.
Cheers,
- C!
"I collect stars, but I keep them in the sky because I just don't have the space at home." - Warren Ellis
Like another poster, I loved every little bit except for the horrible CGI monster. It was totally gastly and ruined the atmosphere of the setting. The lighting on the creature was completely different to the lighting in the scenes - I dont think they even bothered to match it.
All I needed to see is a single flicker every now and then when the queen's device was malfunctioning. That was all that was necessary to the viewer without spoiling it.
The costumes, lighting, setting, writing and acting were all fantastic. It even was a little scary for a seasoned 31 year old. Loved IT! Loved IT!